Saturday, January 28, 2012

Sutherlands bounce check to Association

No one is particularly thrilled about the prospect of having their lesser moments made public, and that's even truer when those that would make them public would do so with the apparent objective merely to embarrass or discredit. Worse still are the occasions when lesser moments are fabricated out of whole cloth for the same purpose. One wouldn't have to walk too far down either direction of any hallway here at GIL to find a homeowner that will claim to be a victim of this sort of demagoguery at the hands of the Sutherlands. And I personally have witnessed people that have found themselves caught up in a Sutherland gossip and discredit campaign that was either a dramatic embellishment of facts or that had absolutely no basis in fact at all.

This 'sort of behavior' - to borrow a phrase from Kit Sutherland - is dangerous politics, because with each successive engagement, the retail price of hypocrisy is ratcheted upward, should one ever find one's self at the cash register paying retail for their own lesser moment. But knowing this doesn't require any special insight; admonishment that reportedly came from Jesus' own mouth more than two millennia ago has served to better advise those that would 'cast the first stone'.

That's why I think it would be surprising for many to learn that Kit and Stuart have bounced a check to our Association at least once. It's true (documentation included and follows post conclusion).  Of course, (Continued...)
it would ordinarily be nearly impossible for anyone to discover this fact, given the opacity of our Association's records. Perhaps part of the dogged determination to maintain that lack of transparency can be at least partially explained by its inherent ability to keep stones out of the hands of those upon whom one is frequently throwing stones downward onto from four floors above.
Sutherlands bounce check to Association

Note: The Blog could not determine if GIL was reimbursed for the returned check charge.


People who read this post also read :



3 comments:

  1. OMG!! Who bounces a check for $64???? I guess they were talking about themselves when they were spreading all those false rumors about my financial condition. Maybe we should take up a collection to help the poor Sutherlands.... LMAO!!! I think there is a $20 in the back of my new BMW. I will be glad to chip in!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. (S)He who lives in a glass house should not throw stones.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you...that's exactly the point I was trying to make :-)

    ReplyDelete