Friday, February 17, 2012

Fix for all Phase II parking garage problems finally identified

It seems like the problems – and cost to remedy them – surrounding the Phase II parking garage never seem to end. Specifically:
  1. Every effort to prevent birds from building nests in the insulation and spreading diseases and mold as a consequence has failed and birds continue to damage the property and leave behind copious droppings on people and their cars; 
  2. The third floor lofts located above the second floor of the parking garage are adversely impacted during cold weather as the thin layer of patchwork insulation is insufficient to enable those units to maintain warmth; 
  3. Cold weather has also necessitated the purchase and installation of an elaborate web of plug-in electric pipe heaters to prevent the exposed plumbing that snakes along the ceiling of the second floor parking level from freezing and bursting (potentially raining raw sewage onto everyone and everything below...yuk!) during winter months – driving up utility expenses for a ticking time bomb solution that has no way of being monitored for the mechanical failures that are inevitable as the heat strips age;
  4. The northern and western sides of the first floor parking level serve as lawsuit in-waiting as there is no barrier to prevent a small child – or pet – from suffering as much as a ten foot free fall from the grass to the pavement floor of the garage below. While it is unclear if the lack of a barrier violates building codes, the Blog has confirmed that the deficiency would prevent our property from passing a housing safety inspection by the Atlanta Housing Authority; 
  5. The lack of personal and property security inherent in the parking garages has been a persistent source of very vocal complaints from homeowners for the past nine years as their cars have been broken into repeatedly and a few have even been stolen from the property outright. 
 
So, on the eve of the Board’s apparent decision to borrow an additional $45,000 to temporarily address just one of the aforementioned problems – the raggedy insulation-turned-bird-nests - the Blog decided to dig a little deeper into the myriad problems associated with the Phase II parking garage to find out why so many of our building-related problems seem to originate there. Our findings were surprising, although they were so predictable they made us wonder why they had never occurred to anyone before. 


We began our search by going back to the construction blue prints and original Phase II building design. What we found were a multitude of last minute construction changes made to the building that, presumably, were made to cut costs once the vast majority of the units had been either sold or were under contract.

With respect to the parking garage, the original design specifications that were submitted to the City as part of the permitting process called for the full enclosure of the Phase II parking garage levels – by a combination of non-permeable materials such as brick or concrete and by metal grating like that used on the side of the Phase I parking garage that runs along Glen Iris Drive.

And if one stops to think about it, their enclosure would eliminate all of the problems so far identified with the Phase II parking garage entirely. The small amount of insulation sprayed onto the ceiling would probably be sufficient to insulate the units above without the cross flow of cold air whipping through the garages, birds would have little opportunity to get into the garage to begin with, security would be enhanced exponentially, the danger of children or pets falling from precipitous heights would be eliminated and the ambient temperature of air around the exposed pipes would be sufficiently greater than the outside temperature to prevent them from freezing and bursting.

Before we add another $45,000 to the staggering mountain of debt our Board is arranging to saddle us with in secret, an open discussion that includes homeowners and a thorough review of the original building specifications and an estimate of what the cost might be to fully or partially implement them needs to take place. And when you consider that $45,000 spend that’s currently on the table is a Band-Aid that’s expected to address just one of the many problems noted above and that will need to be done again before the proposed loan for the proposed temporary fix is even paid off, we may discover that there is a more economical way to solve all of the problems associated with the Phase II parking garage permanently, either in phases or all at once.


People who read this post also read :



4 comments:

  1. While it might make sense and may even be a cheaper way to solve all the problems with the parking garage, as long as Kit and Stuart are running the show it will never even be discussed, much less happen. They don't like the idea. Simple as that. I know this because the 6th floor residents even offered to pay ALL the costs necessary to enclose the first floor parking area in response to the out of control car break-ins and Kit and Stuart shot it down. I think homeowner Nancy Beasley also tried to get some movement on the same issue by surveying homeowners on whether they supported such a thing or not and that too, went nowhere.

    In my opinion, Kit and Stuart have demonstrated time and time again that they could care less about the lower level parking garage situation and every other concern relevant to Ph 2 6th floor homeowners. That's why they attempted to pull that stunt last year of making roof repairs the responsibility of just 6th floor residents. That is, until the threat of legal action and a certain defeat on that front caused Stuart to reconsider such an ill-conceived plan.
    I found it odd that my neighbor on the 6th floor, Yoel Bakas, would go along with such a blatantly unfair plan to disproportionately off load the costs of roof repairs onto 6th floor residents while he was the Board president, but I guess that just speaks to who really makes the decisions around here, titles be damned.
    Of course if Kit and Stuart parked on the lower level parking deck and had their cars broken into regularly (so far I personally have had my cars broken into a total of NINE times since I moved here) then I'm sure their tune would be totally 180 degrees from where it currently is. But they don't, so nothing will happen on this score. Mark my words. Sad but true!

    ReplyDelete
  2. At a minimum this is a maintenance problem. We should at least have the insolation maintained. This has been a problem for years, and talked about for years in the board meetings. Yet, with no action to fix or repair. Now the 2nd floor parking deck looks like a haunted house. Board.... lets at least maintain our property. Its ugly, but not ugly enough to scare away the birds!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Blogger, why are you concerned about the budget?!? I mean it's only 45,000. That's less than we pay for water or Internet. It's nothing. We have money to burn, carts to throw away, lots of expendibles here at Glen Iris Lofts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And if CMAs 'loan setup fee/commisssion/documentation fee/whatever else they called it' on the last loan is any guide, $45K will prolly not even cover their same 'loan/setup fee/commission/documentation fee/whatever else they are going to call it' for this loan! Lol. What a boondoggle.

      Delete